Re: autovacuum_work_mem

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autovacuum_work_mem
Date: 2013-10-21 16:29:48
Message-ID: 20131021162948.GL2706@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> +1. If changing at all, then maybe just "autovacuum_mem"? It's not
> like there's a different parameter to control a different kind of
> memory in autovac, is there?

+1 on that, for my 2c.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-10-21 16:32:52 Re: stats for network traffic WIP
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-10-21 16:25:36 Re: Commitfest II CLosed