| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
| Date: | 2013-10-18 20:35:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20131018203511.GF16188@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-10-18 13:16:52 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 10/18/2013 12:29 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2013-10-18 09:32:15 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> For that matter, 9.4 is a very good time (relatively speaking) to break
> >> replication tools because the new logical replication is going to cause
> >> everyone to rev their tools anyway.
> >
> > We're hopefully getting changeset extraction in, but there's little
> > chance of a full blown replication solution making it in in 9.4...
>
> I thought changeset extraction was the only thing going into core? What
> else do we need?
Well, I personally want more in core mid/long term, but anyway.
Without released, proven and stable logical in-core replication
technology using this, I don't see why repmgr or something related would
need/want to change?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2013-10-18 20:46:18 | Re: space reserved for WAL record does not match what was written: panic on windows |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-10-18 20:16:52 | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |