| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) |
| Date: | 2013-10-17 13:51:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20131017135151.GD9746@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió:
> Actually, this could be fixed by having a way to declare one of the
> overloaded functions as the preferred option and resolving ambiguous
> calls in favor of the highest-priority function. In fact,
> EnterpriseDB has added just such an option to Advanced Server 9.3, and
> it fixes several longstanding difficult choices between being
> Oracle-compatible and being PostgreSQL-compatible; we're now more
> compatible with both.
How does this work?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-10-17 14:06:16 | Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2013-10-17 13:37:34 | Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval) |