Re: proposal: simple date constructor from numeric values

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: proposal: simple date constructor from numeric values
Date: 2013-10-11 15:05:15
Message-ID: 20131011150515.GN4825@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeevan Chalke escribió:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
> > thank you,
> >
> > I have no comments
>
> Assigned it to committer.

Hm, these functions are marked as STABLE, right? Why aren't they
immutable?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-10-11 15:41:16 Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-10-11 14:47:40 Re: background workers, round three