From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: relscan_details.h |
Date: | 2013-10-02 12:59:42 |
Message-ID: | 20131002125942.GB137331@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If we had not made massive cleanup changes years ago, our code would not
> be as good as it is today. By avoiding cleanup to reduce the burden on
> people who use our code, we are positioning our code on a slow decline
> in clarity.
>
> What I don't want to do is get into a mode where every code cleanup has
> to be verified that it isn't going to excessively burden outside code
> users. Cleanup is hard enough, and adding another check to that process
> makes cleanup even less likely.
I don't disagree with that, but I would describe the proposal as a mild
dirty-up for the sake of build performance, not a cleanup.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sameer Thakur | 2013-10-02 13:10:51 | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-10-02 12:07:13 | Re: No Index-Only Scan on Partial Index |