From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: unaccent module - two params function should be immutable |
Date: | 2013-09-24 21:36:58 |
Message-ID: | 20130924213658.GB21534@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:15:47AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I have developed the attached patch based on your suggestion. I did not
> >> see anything in the code that would make it STABLE, except a lookup of a
> >> dictionary library:
> >>
> >> dictOid = get_ts_dict_oid(stringToQualifiedNameList("unaccent"),
> >> false);
> >
> > yes, it risk, but similar is with timezones, and other external data.
>
> That's a catalog lookup - not a reliance on external data.
Sorry, I was wrong. Only unaccent_dict() calls get_ts_dict_oid(), and
we aren't changing the signature of that function.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-09-24 22:14:06 | Re: Minmax indexes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-09-24 21:25:51 | Re: Suggestion: Issue warning when calling SET TRANSACTION outside transaction block |