Re: record identical operator

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: record identical operator
Date: 2013-09-16 21:04:14
Message-ID: 20130916210414.GA27150@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-09-16 16:58:21 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> memcmp() has served well for HOT and for _equalConst(); why would it suddenly
> fall short for MV maintenance?

I don't have a problem using it internally, I have a problem exposing
the capability to sql. Don't tell me that's the same.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2013-09-16 21:10:16 Re: git apply vs patch -p1
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-09-16 21:03:00 Re: Proposal: json_populate_record and nested json objects