Re: v9.3.0: bug with pgdump -s?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Eric B(dot) Ridge" <e_ridge(at)tcdi(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: v9.3.0: bug with pgdump -s?
Date: 2013-09-15 18:11:39
Message-ID: 20130915181139.GA17039@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2013-09-15 12:01:29 -0400, Eric B. Ridge wrote:
> Am I expecting too much against 'pg_catalog' or is something bugged?

Yes, I think you do expect too much. It'd perhaps be nice to give a
nicer error message, but some of the stuff (like the pseudotypes you see
warnings about here) doesn't fully follow the public rules.

The likely reason you're seing the problem with the opclasses being
output incompletely is that internal entries don't all have full
dependency information.

What did you actually try to find out?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Ulbrich 2013-09-15 18:32:27 Unary Operators
Previous Message Eric B. Ridge 2013-09-15 16:01:29 v9.3.0: bug with pgdump -s?