Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT
Date: 2013-09-12 00:35:09
Message-ID: 20130912003509.GB243762@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:00:41PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > * Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com) wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 07:13:16PM -0700, David Johnston wrote:
> >> > Your feelings on how far to back-patch?
> >>
> >> All supported versions. The current behavior is a bug every way I look at it.
> >
> > Agreed. I noticed a stale backend hanging around after a
> > cancel/shutdown and this sounds very likely to be the cause and it'd be
> > really great to get it fixed.
>
> +1.

Committed; TODO item added for the remaining race condition.

--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-09-12 00:47:45 Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE
Previous Message Noah Misch 2013-09-11 23:54:19 Re: 9.4 HEAD: select() failed in postmaster