Re: psql: small patch to correct filename formatting error in '\s FILE' output

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql: small patch to correct filename formatting error in '\s FILE' output
Date: 2013-09-10 01:25:00
Message-ID: 20130910012500.GE32173@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:30:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Related email from the archives on this subject:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/37ed240d0611200645l5b70c8ddw5fb735e0d35a7b22@mail.gmail.com
>
> I agree with the opinion stated there that \cd with no argument really
> ought to do what "cd" with no argument usually does on the platform.
> So if we're going to fix \cd to print the resulting current directory,
> wouldn't it work to just set "dir" to "." rather than "/" for Windows?
>
> > Does commit 0725065b just need to be reverted, or is an additional
> > patch required to remove the prefixed working directory from \s output?
>
> Offhand it looked like reverting the commit would be enough, but I
> didn't look hard to see if there had been any subsequent related
> changes. [ pokes around... ] Well, at least there are still no other
> uses of pset.dirname.

I still see that weird behavior in git head:

pgdevel=# \s history.txt
Wrote history to file "./history.txt".
pgdevel=# \s /tmp/history.txt
Wrote history to file ".//tmp/history.txt".
pgdevel=# \cd /tmp
pgdevel=# \s /tmp/history.txt
Wrote history to file "/tmp//tmp/history.txt".

Should I revert the suggested patch?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-09-10 01:27:56 Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-09-10 01:05:55 Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes