From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Vérité <daniel(dot)verite(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: file_fdw target file ownership |
Date: | 2013-09-09 19:58:12 |
Message-ID: | 20130909195812.GE841236@alap2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-09-09 21:41:00 +0200, Daniel Vérité wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
> > > One would be to use open(O_NOFOLLOW)?
> >
> > That would only stop symlink attacks, not hardlink variants;
> > and it'd probably stop some legitimate use-cases too.
>
> The creation of the hardlink is denied by the OS based on the
> attacker not having sufficient permissions to the target file.
> In principle the mentioned loophole is limited to a symlink, which
> is not restricted at create time.
It only requires search privileges, doesn't it?
andres(at)alap2:~$ ln /etc/shadow /tmp/frak
andres(at)alap2:~$ cat /tmp/frak
cat: /tmp/frak: Permission denied
andres(at)alap2:~$ ls -l /tmp/frak
-rw-r----- 2 root shadow 1652 Jun 4 22:05 /tmp/frak
There are patches around preventing that kind of thing, but they aren't
too widespread yet.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-09-09 20:29:36 | Re: file_fdw target file ownership |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-09-09 19:51:17 | Re: strange IS NULL behaviour |