Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Date: 2013-09-05 21:05:28
Message-ID: 20130905210528.GA556998@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-02-26 13:08:54 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> Just for reference, thats the grammar for SET/SHOW:
>
> var_name: ColId { $$ = $1; }
> | var_name '.' ColId
>
> Any arguments whether we should try to validate postgres -c,
> set_config and SET/SHOW the same?

Any input here?

Currently set_config() and postgres -c basically don't have any
restrictions on the passed guc name whereas SHOW, SET and
postgresql.conf do.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-09-05 21:06:41 Re: strange IS NULL behaviour
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-09-05 19:53:38 Re: Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric？