Re: lcr v5 - introduction of InvalidCommandId

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: lcr v5 - introduction of InvalidCommandId
Date: 2013-09-05 16:59:44
Message-ID: 20130905165944.GB349020@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-09-05 12:44:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 2013-09-03 11:40:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> > 0002 wal_decoding: Introduce InvalidCommandId and declare that to be the new maximum for CommandCounterIncrement
> >>
> >> I'm still unconvinced we want this.
> >
> > Ok, so the reason for the existance of this patch is that currently
> > there is no way to represent a "unset" CommandId. This is a problem for
> > the following patches because we need to log the cmin, cmax of catalog
> > rows and obviously there can be rows where cmax is unset.
>
> For heap tuples, we solve this problem by using flag bits. Why not
> adopt the same approach?

We can, while it makes the amount of data stored/logged slightly larger
and it seems to lead to less idiomatic code to me, so if there's another
-1 I'll go that way.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-09-05 17:02:17 Re: get rid of SQL_ASCII?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-09-05 16:57:59 Re: strange IS NULL behaviour