Re: Backup throttling

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Antonin Houska <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backup throttling
Date: 2013-09-03 22:41:27
Message-ID: 20130903224127.GD7018@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-09-03 12:56:53 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Antonin Houska wrote:
>
> > + <para>
> > + Suffixes <literal>k</literal> (kilobytes) and <literal>m</literal>
> > + (megabytes) are accepted. For example: <literal>10m</literal>
> > + </para>
>
> "m" is for meters, or milli. Please use "M" here.

Shouldn't it be MB? Consistent with GUCs?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-09-03 22:47:37 Re: WAL CPU overhead/optimization (was Master-slave visibility order)
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2013-09-03 21:25:01 Re: WAL CPU overhead/optimization (was Master-slave visibility order)