From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Charles Sheridan <cesheri(at)swbell(dot)net> |
Cc: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it>, "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CTAGS for PL/pgSQL ? |
Date: | 2013-08-29 13:33:11 |
Message-ID: | 20130829133311.GD27301@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:18:03AM -0500, Charles Sheridan wrote:
>
> >>Does anyone know if there are any CTAGS extensions or variants that support
> >>PL/pgSQL ?
> >>
> >>I use exuberant-ctags which does not support it, and a web search does not
> >>return anything promising.
> >As far as I know, the quick answer is NO.
> >However I made a few simple tests with etags and it seems to work with
> >plpgsql. However I would expect it to fail for some advanced features.
> >
> >Luca
> >
> Thanks Luca, unfortunately (?) I'm a pretty heavy Vim user, so etags
> is not in my scope.
Uh, I think Vim can use etags, no? Isn't etags Exuberant Ctags? The
Exuberant Ctags's FAQ mentions Vim:
http://ctags.sourceforge.net/faq.html#11
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Johnston | 2013-08-29 13:43:57 | Re: Using regexp_matches in the WHERE clause |
Previous Message | Charles Sheridan | 2013-08-29 13:18:03 | Re: CTAGS for PL/pgSQL ? |