Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, amutu(at)amutu(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour
Date: 2013-08-21 11:33:40
Message-ID: 20130821113340.GC8193@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:32:20PM +0200, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 08/14/2013 11:27 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:31:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:19:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> Attached are docs that add the new syntax, and mention it is
> >>> non-standard; you can see the output here:
> >>>
> >>> http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-SQL
> >>>
> >>> We do document three syntaxes for substring() in the same table, one row
> >>> for each, so there is precedent for doing this.
> >> Attached is an updated patch with a proper example. I could move the
> >> extra syntax into the description of the existing trim entry instead.
> > Patch applied to head. I did not apply this to 9.3 in case we change
> > our minds about documenting this.
>
> This commit introduced the following:
>
> doc$ make -s html
> Processing HTML.index...
> 2409 entries loaded...
> collateindex.pl: duplicated index entry found: TRIM
> 1 entries ignored...
> Done.

Interesting. I didn't realize HTML shows errors that 'make check'
doesn't. Anyway, I have removed the second index reference, so the
error should be gone now. Thanks for the report.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ダンミンフーン 2013-08-22 13:17:40 After promote, DB can not UPDATE with SAVEPOINT (could not access status of transaction 1409172)
Previous Message Vik Fearing 2013-08-21 10:32:20 Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-08-21 11:49:33 Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-08-21 11:05:26 Re: Back-patch change in hashed DISTINCT estimation?