From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: danger of stats_temp_directory = /dev/shm |
Date: | 2013-08-19 19:06:48 |
Message-ID: | 20130819190648.GB26775@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-08-19 13:50:38 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I think we should change 9.3 to be restrictive about ownership/permissions
> > on the stats_temp_directory (ie, require owner = postgres user,
> > permissions = 0700, same as for the $PGDATA directory).
>
> Not an easy thing to do, this. It should be done as a GUC check hook,
> ISTM, but this doesn't work because the first time those are run we
> haven't yet changed to the data directory, and so any relative path
> (which the default value is) will cause the check to fail (I *assume*
> setting an absolute path would work, but I haven't tried). We could
> skip the check on the first run, and verify the directory separately in
> PostmasterMain() after changing CWD, but I don't see any way to detect
> that we're in the initial run of GUC processing. Any thoughts? Maybe
> the idea of using a GUC check hook is flawed, but I don't think so
> because we also need to verify a directory when the setting changes on
> SIGHUP.
Hm. Is a check like that actually sufficient? The idea of setting
stats_temp_directory to /dev/shm/postgres or similar in all of several
clusters on one machine doesn't seem to be that far fetched.
The only idea I have to prevent that is writing some minimal pg_control
like file into the temp stats directory iff it's empty. Then, when
reusing a stats temp directory, refuse to work unless it has the same
ids.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-08-19 19:10:02 | Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL |
Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-08-19 19:02:21 | Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL |