Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: amutu(at)amutu(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8335: trim() un-document behaviour
Date: 2013-08-14 21:27:22
Message-ID: 20130814212721.GA12857@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:31:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:19:30PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Attached are docs that add the new syntax, and mention it is
> > non-standard; you can see the output here:
> >
> > http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-SQL
> >
> > We do document three syntaxes for substring() in the same table, one row
> > for each, so there is precedent for doing this.
>
> Attached is an updated patch with a proper example. I could move the
> extra syntax into the description of the existing trim entry instead.

Patch applied to head. I did not apply this to 9.3 in case we change
our minds about documenting this.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message barnhart.jon 2013-08-14 22:25:02 BUG #8384: Missing dll
Previous Message David Fetter 2013-08-14 14:00:08 Re: BUG #8381: data base inconsistancy

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-08-14 22:05:14 Re: danger of stats_temp_directory = /dev/shm
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-08-14 20:36:38 Re: 9.4 regression