From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomonari Katsumata <t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomonari Katsumata <katsumata(dot)tomonari(at)po(dot)ntts(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? |
Date: | 2013-08-08 16:57:51 |
Message-ID: | 20130808165751.GI14729@alap2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-08-08 12:50:31 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 01:27:35PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > Why are we suddenly trying to make this even more complicated? It's too
> > > late to redesign stuff without very good evidence that it's
> > > needed. Renaming trigger files and changing their format certainly
> > > doesn't seem appropriate post-beta.
> > >
> > > Let's just leave this as is, and remove the code in 9.4/9.5.
> > Sorry. I should have been clearer. I meant that for 9.4~ only. For 9.3
> > yes it's too late.
>
> We seem to be all over the map with the fast promotion code --- some
> people don't trust it, some people want an option to enable the old
> method, and some people want the old method removed.
>
> This has left us in an odd situation where we are going to ship 9.3
> old-method code with no way to enable it in case we need it.
That's not true. It's relatively easy to trigger it. You just can't use
pg_ctl. Which seems completely fine for debugging.
Imo there's no need to do anything. Which is what we've concluded on
before...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-08-08 17:15:14 | Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-08-08 16:50:31 | Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? |