From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joe Van Dyk <joe(at)tanga(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Adding ip4r to Postgresql core? |
Date: | 2013-08-08 04:24:24 |
Message-ID: | 20130808042424.GL10718@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Van Dyk <joe(at)tanga(dot)com> writes:
> > Any chance ip4r could be an official postgresql extension?
>
> That's been proposed before, and rejected before, on the grounds that
> since it doesn't support IPv6 its days are numbered.
Actually, that's not true. Quoting from the linked readme file,
: IP4R therefore supports six distinct data types:
:
: ip4 - a single IPv4 address
: ip4r - an arbitrary range of IPv4 addresses
: ip6 - a single IPv6 address
: ip6r - an arbitrary range of IPv6 addresses
: ipaddress - a single IPv4 or IPv6 address
: iprange - an arbitrary range of IPv4 or IPv6 addresses
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vishalakshi Navaneethakrishnan | 2013-08-08 04:32:05 | Re: How to avoid Force Autovacuum |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-08-08 04:06:42 | Re: Adding ip4r to Postgresql core? |