* Andres Freund (andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> People know what to expect from .d directories, that's why I suggested
> it, don't feel really strongly about it. I dislike naming the
> subdirectories pgconf/... et al though, we should reference the original
> files name, instead of introducing new abbreviations.
*People* should not be messing around with files under $PGDATA- that's
half the point. conf.d or other names which look like configuration
directories that an admin should modify are a *bad* idea.
Thanks,
Stephen