| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: reply-to set |
| Date: | 2013-07-30 17:46:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20130730174650.GT14652@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Greg Stark wrote:
> I'm normally against setting reply-to. In these two cases it would be
> defensible. The main problem I see is that users who send mail to
> these lists probably should be already setting reply-to anyways
> themselves. They probably don't want to receive personal responses but
> to have replies go to their own internal customer support lists. I
> assume MK keeps the reply-to if it's already present?
Yes -- if there's a reply-to already, it's not changed.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-30 17:52:06 | Re: reply-to set |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-07-30 17:45:57 | Re: reply-to set |