From: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Reduce maximum error in tuples estimation after vacuum. |
Date: | 2013-07-22 07:20:54 |
Message-ID: | 20130722.162054.187846141.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, I'm very sory to take your time on this mess.
ul 2013 16:06:11 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote in <014201ce7bc6$f71eb950$e55c2bf0$(at)kapila@huawei.com>
> I understood your patch's algorithm, but still I have doubt in my mind that
> if the next analyze can correct the estimates,
> Why would that be not sufficient. Please refer my last mail for analysis of
> same
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/000601ce77ad$7d3388e0$779a9aa0$@kapila@
> huawei.com
Hmm. I've reconfirmed what was happened on my test set.
As the result, the misestimation with dead_tup = 0 which I
thought to observe has turned out to be an illusion..
Tuple number estimation is working as it is expected.
I withdraw this patch.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Миша Тюрин | 2013-07-22 07:30:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Wal sync odirect |
Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2013-07-22 07:13:37 | Re: Proposal: template-ify (binary) extensions |