Re: strange IS NULL behaviour

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:03:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 04:29:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No, it isn't, or at least it's far from the only place. If we're going
> >> to change this, we would also want to change the behavior of tests on
> >> RECORD values, which is something that would have to happen at runtime.
>
> > I checked RECORD and that behaves with recursion:
>
> Apparently you don't even understand the problem. All of these examples
> you're showing are constants. Try something like
>
> declare r record;
> ...
> select ... into r ...
> if (r is null) ...

Not aparently --- I already said I didn't understand the problem.
Should I just mark this as a TODO?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +