From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll |
Date: | 2013-06-27 18:51:41 |
Message-ID: | 20130627185140.GJ3757@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan escribió:
>
> On 06/27/2013 02:38 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>If we're going to try harder to ensure that reviewers are credited,
> >>it'd probably be better to take both the commit log and the release
> >>notes out of that loop.
> >I'd pull the reviewers out of the CF app. Even in its current
> >implementation, that's the easiest route.
>
> I have not honestly found these to be terribly accurate.
Yeah, they're not. I do take care to review past threads when crediting
reviewers in commit messages, and I don't even bother to look at the CF
app.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-06-27 19:02:27 | Re: Computer VARSIZE_ANY(PTR) during debugging |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-06-27 18:51:08 | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll |