Re: C++ compiler

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C++ compiler
Date: 2013-06-24 23:59:06
Message-ID: 20130624235906.GB14698@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:45:48PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> I see value in making the codebase compileable with g++... and down the
> track I can see being able to use basic class features as quite useful
> given Pg's fairly OO internal design. Inline template functions instead
> of macros would be nice. I've worked with C++ enough not to be overly
> excited by the idea of going down the rabbit hole of Boost, complex
> template arrangements, etc, and I don't love the STL ... but any
> sensible project adopting C++ carefully picks and chooses what features
> it uses and how.

I think the big question is whether you can _control_ what C++ features
are used, or whether you are perpetually instructing users what C++
features not to use.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2013-06-25 00:19:39 Re: C++ compiler
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-06-24 23:51:25 Re: [RFC] Minmax indexes