| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Implementing incremental backup |
| Date: | 2013-06-19 23:12:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20130620.081223.1792528449674354429.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> * Tatsuo Ishii (ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org) wrote:
>> Yeah, at first I thought using WAL was a good idea. However I realized
>> that the problem using WAL is we cannot backup unlogged tables because
>> they are not written to WAL.
>
> Unlogged tables are also nuked on recovery, so I'm not sure why you
> think an incremental backup would help.. If you're recovering (even
> from a simple crash), unlogged tables are going to go away.
If my memory serves, unlogged tables are not nuked when PostgeSQL is
stopped by a planned shutdown (not by crash or by "pg_ctl -m i
stop"). If PostgreSQL works so, incremental backup should be able to
recover unlogged tables as well, at least people would expect so IMO.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2013-06-19 23:18:42 | Re: SET work_mem = '1TB'; |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-06-19 22:56:19 | Re: Implementing incremental backup |