Re: Server side lo-funcs name

> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>> Recently we got a complain about server side large object function
>>> names described in the doc:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51B2413F.8010305@gmail.com
>>>
>>> In the doc:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/lo-funcs.html
>>>
>>> "There are server-side functions callable from SQL that correspond to
>>> each of the client-side functions described above; indeed, for the
>>> most part the client-side functions are simply interfaces to the
>>> equivalent server-side functions"
>>>
>>>>From the description it is hard for users to find out server side
>>> functions "loread" and "lowrite" becuase they are looking for
>>> "lo_read" and "lo_write". So I think his complain is fair. Included
>>> patches attempt to fix the problem.
>>
>> I have committed this.
>
> Did you see my email with proposed alternative text? You didn't even
> fix the whitespace error I pointed out.

I don't know why but I haven't received your email. I just found the
email in the web archive and it looks better than what I proposed. Do
you want to commit it yourself?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp