From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: all_visible replay aborting due to uninitialized pages |
Date: | 2013-06-06 14:28:13 |
Message-ID: | 20130606142813.GD29964@alap2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-06-06 10:22:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Yeah, I think it's fine. The patch also looks fine, although I think
> >> the comments could use a bit of tidying. I guess we need to
> >> back-patch this all the way back to 8.4? It will require some
> >> adjustments for the older branches.
> >
> > I think 9.2 is actually far enough and it should apply there. Before
> > that we only logged the unsetting of all_visible via
> > heap_(inset|update|delete)'s wal records not the setting as far as I can
> > tell. So I don't immediately see a danger < 9.2.
>
> OK. I have committed this. For 9.2, I had to backport
> log_newpage_buffer() and use XLByteEQ rather than ==.
Thanks!
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-06-06 14:52:59 | Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-06-06 14:24:30 | Re: pg_ugprade use of --check and --link |