| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Naoya Anzai <anzai-naoya(at)mxu(dot)nes(dot)nec(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Akio Iwaasa <iwaasa(at)mxs(dot)nes(dot)nec(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: Memory-leak in BackgroundWriter(and Checkpointer) |
| Date: | 2013-06-04 18:02:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20130604180229.GJ5871@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
* Andres Freund (andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Seems more consistent with the rest of the code too. But anyway, I am
> fine with fixing it either way.
Patch attached which mirrors what GetRunningTransactionData() (the other
function called from LogStandbySnapshot) does, more-or-less- uses a
static variable to keep track of memory allocated for the data being
returned to the caller.
Looks like this will need to be back-patched to 9.0. Barring objections
or better ideas, I'll do that in a few hours.
Thanks,
Stephen
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| hs_memleak.patch | text/x-diff | 4.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-06-04 18:05:25 | Re: Memory-leak in BackgroundWriter(and Checkpointer) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-06-04 17:53:03 | Re: Memory-leak in BackgroundWriter(and Checkpointer) |