From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately |
Date: | 2013-05-29 14:43:59 |
Message-ID: | 20130529144359.GD3955@alap2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-05-29 07:35:42 -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/29/2013 05:52 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> On 2013-05-29 09:30:43 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> >>>> 2) How should we handle already installed extensions, which
> >>>> will still lack dependency records after this bugfix?
> >>>
> >>> I don't really see any other way here than providing an upgrade
> >>> script that will somehow re-attach those objects, either by
> >>> directly messing with pg_depends (that is, when there's a
> >>> systematic way to get the OIDs of the missing RULEs), or by
> >>> maybe doing a drop/create on the RULEs?
> >>
> >> Couldn't ALTER EXTENSION ... ADD ...; be brought up to speed to
> >> support this?
> >
> > I'll blame the Time Zone Difference Recovering. I felt like
> > missing something…
>
> Seems like the perfect idea, but is that something we would backpatch?
Sounds better to me than manually fiddling with pg_depend... We can't
really drop and recreate the RULEs, there might be dependencies
preventing that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-05-29 15:07:02 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-05-29 14:42:45 | Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...) |