Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately
Date: 2013-05-29 10:31:09
Message-ID: 20130529103109.GA3955@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-05-29 09:30:43 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> > 2) How should we handle already installed extensions, which will still
> > lack dependency records after this bugfix?
>
> I don't really see any other way here than providing an upgrade script
> that will somehow re-attach those objects, either by directly messing
> with pg_depends (that is, when there's a systematic way to get the OIDs
> of the missing RULEs), or by maybe doing a drop/create on the RULEs?

Couldn't ALTER EXTENSION ... ADD ...; be brought up to speed to support
this?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-05-29 11:40:08 Re: FIX: auto_explain docs
Previous Message Maciej Gajewski 2013-05-29 08:33:44 Re: Unsigned integer types