Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Date: 2013-05-28 21:11:05
Message-ID: 20130528211105.GB26313@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:58:33AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 05/28/2013 12:41 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I'm happy with that.
> >
> > I was also thinking about collecting changes not related just to disk
> > format, if any exist.
> Any wire protocol or syntax changes?
>
> I can't seem to find a "things we want to do in wire protocol v4" doc in
> the wiki but I know I've seen occasional discussion of things that can't
> be done without protocol changes. Anyone with a better memory than me
> able to pitch in?

Sure, it is on the TODO list:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#.2Fcontrib.2Fpg_upgrade

I can only get a link to pg_upgrade from there, so look two sections
below that for "Wire Protocol Changes".

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-05-28 21:18:28 Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-05-28 21:07:48 Re: Unsigned integer types