From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Sahagian, David" <david(dot)sahagian(at)emc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: replanning Prepared Statements ? |
Date: | 2013-05-21 20:42:45 |
Message-ID: | 20130521204245.GC1322@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:39:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Sahagian, David" <david(dot)sahagian(at)emc(dot)com> writes:
> > I see in the Release Notes for 9.3 beta . . .
> > "Force cached functions to be replanned if the search_path changes (Tom Lane)
> > Previously functions already run in the current session ignored search_path changes."
>
> > Question:
> > Do Prepared Statements also get replanned, if the search_path changes ?
>
> Yes ... that release note text still needs work, it's really about any
> cached plan, which affects more than just functions.
OK, attached release note patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
cached.diff | text/x-diff | 1.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dev Kumkar | 2013-05-21 20:59:24 | Re: [GENERAL] ODBC constructs |
Previous Message | Kjetil Jørgensen | 2013-05-21 20:21:51 | Contents of data/base/<oid> and no corresponding entry in pg_database |