Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report

From: 'Bruce Momjian' <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: 'PostgreSQL-development' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report
Date: 2013-05-16 22:06:53
Message-ID: 20130516220653.GC16506@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:38:59PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I usually mention items that have a user-visible change, or are easy to
> > explain, or apply to most queries. I am not sure this falls into any
> > of
> > those categories.
> >
> > Can you suggest some release note text for this item?
>
> I can think of below text:
>
> Reduce query processing overhead by avoiding insertion of useless plan nodes
> OR
> Improve performance of certain kind of queries by avoiding extra processing
> of doing projection
>
> This applies to queries doing identity projection ("SELECT * FROM ...") for
> partitioned tables.

Uh, that's pretty complex for our release notes, and hard to understand
for most users. All they will know is that PG is faster --- we don't
document every speedup.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2013-05-16 22:41:36 Re: PLJava for Postgres 9.2.
Previous Message Paul Hammond 2013-05-16 21:59:38 PLJava for Postgres 9.2.