Re: RT3.4 query needed a lot more tuning with 9.2 than it did with 8.1

From: "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RT3.4 query needed a lot more tuning with 9.2 than it did with 8.1
Date: 2013-05-15 13:52:28
Message-ID: 20130515135228.GI27807@aart.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:52:29PM -0700, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Mark Felder 2013-05-13 <op(dot)ww1gv9fd34t2sn(at)markf(dot)office(dot)supranet(dot)net>
> > What version of DBIx-SearchBuilder do you have on that server? The
> > RT guys usually recommend you have the latest possible so RT is
> > performing the most sane/optimized queries possible for your
> > database. I honestly don't know if it will make a difference for
> > you, but it's worth a shot.
>
> That's a "never touch a running system" kind of machine there, we are
> happy that they let us finally upgrade at least the PostgreSQL part of
> the setup, so changing any perl libs there is out of the question.
>
> The version is libdbix-searchbuilder-perl 1.26-1 from Debian Sarge/3.1
> *cough*.
>
> Christoph
> --

Hi Christoph,

I understand the sentiment but you really should consider upgrading. I
think the current release is 1.63 and since it is the DB interface it
could have a positive effect on your problem not to mention that they
do fix bugs. :)

Regards,
Ken

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shaun Thomas 2013-05-15 15:31:46 Thinking About Correlated Columns (again)
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2013-05-15 06:52:29 Re: RT3.4 query needed a lot more tuning with 9.2 than it did with 8.1