| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | pg_ctl idempotent item removed |
| Date: | 2013-05-03 17:28:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20130503172816.GD15498@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I have removed both pg_ctl idempotent-commit items from the TODO list:
<listitem>
<para>
Allow pg_ctl --idempotent to a 'success' return code if the requested
start/stop action fails, but the cluster is already in the requested
state (Peter Eisentraut)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Change pg_ctl to return an error code if start fails because the
server is already running (Peter Eisentraut)
</para>
</listitem>
My question is do we really want the second item reverted?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-05-03 17:42:33 | Re: Commit subject line |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-05-03 17:23:26 | Commit subject line |