Re: Recovery target 'immediate'

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recovery target 'immediate'
Date: 2013-05-02 23:55:13
Message-ID: 20130502235513.GC5933@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 09:04:20AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> If we feel strongly about user interface design problems we should
> treat them the same way we treat performance issues. Profile to
> identify problem areas, analyze problems in those areas and suggest
> solutions, then make tests to check that the new interface genuinely
> works better than the old. That is proper UI improvement, not just
> knee jerk reactions.

I am not sure if you are serious or now, but for me, email discussion is
sufficient.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-05-02 23:56:27 Re: Recovery target 'immediate'
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-05-02 23:53:39 Re: \watch stuck on execution of commands returning no tuples