From: | Wolfgang Keller <feliphil(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Correct implementation of 1:n relationship with n>0? |
Date: | 2013-04-30 14:39:05 |
Message-ID: | 20130430163905.77d43412c0176c3d9ebd8d90@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
It hit me today that a 1:n relationship can't be implemented just by a
single foreign key constraint if n>0. I must have been sleeping very
deeply not to notice this.
E.g. if there is a table "list" and another table "list_item" and the
relationship can be described as "every list has at least one
list_item" (and every list_item can only be part of one list, but
this is trivial).
A "correct" solution would require (at least?):
1. A foreign key pointing from each list_item to its list
2. Another foreign key pointing from each list to one of its list_item.
But this must be a list_item that itself points to the same list, so
just a simple foreign key constraint doesn't do it.
3. When a list has more than one list_item, and you want to delete the
list_item that its list points to, you have to "re-point" the foreign
key constraint on the list first. Do I need to use stored proceures
then for all insert, update, delete actions?
(4. Anything else that I've not seen?)
Is there a "straight" (and tested) solution for this in PostgreSQL, that
someone has already implemented and that can be re-used?
No, I definitely don't want to get into programming PL/PgSQL myself.
especially if the solution has to warrant data integrity under all
circumstances. Such as concurrent update, insert, delete etc.
TIA,
Sincerely,
Wolfgang
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2013-04-30 15:12:05 | Re: Correct implementation of 1:n relationship with n>0? |
Previous Message | Jasen Betts | 2013-04-27 06:34:45 | Re: execute |