From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: event trigger API documentation? |
Date: | 2013-04-18 15:35:57 |
Message-ID: | 20130418153557.GC2246@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > You can be as much silent as you want in marketing materials (though
> > maybe Berkus will disagree with you about being silent there), but it is
> > not admissible to be silent in the documentation or pretend the feature
> > is not there. Whatever got committed, however small, needs to be
> > properly documented.
>
> Definitely, yes.
>
> The only questions in this thread are:
>
> - only docs or docs + contrib example?
>
> Tom said it's too late for the contrib example.
So there's already an answer to this question, isn't there.
> - what about support for PLs other than C and PLpgSQL?
>
> It used to be part of the patch, and I don't understand well enough
> the development calendar to guess if I'm supposed to extract that
> from earlier patch or if that's too late for 9.3. I'm not sure
> what Peter's idea are wrt to the calendar here.
It seems far too late for more code at this stage. IMO anyway.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2013-04-18 15:44:02 | Re: (auto)vacuum truncate exclusive lock |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-04-18 15:32:59 | Re: event trigger API documentation? |