Re: event trigger API documentation?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: event trigger API documentation?
Date: 2013-04-18 15:35:57
Message-ID: 20130418153557.GC2246@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > You can be as much silent as you want in marketing materials (though
> > maybe Berkus will disagree with you about being silent there), but it is
> > not admissible to be silent in the documentation or pretend the feature
> > is not there. Whatever got committed, however small, needs to be
> > properly documented.
>
> Definitely, yes.
>
> The only questions in this thread are:
>
> - only docs or docs + contrib example?
>
> Tom said it's too late for the contrib example.

So there's already an answer to this question, isn't there.

> - what about support for PLs other than C and PLpgSQL?
>
> It used to be part of the patch, and I don't understand well enough
> the development calendar to guess if I'm supposed to extract that
> from earlier patch or if that's too late for 9.3. I'm not sure
> what Peter's idea are wrt to the calendar here.

It seems far too late for more code at this stage. IMO anyway.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2013-04-18 15:44:02 Re: (auto)vacuum truncate exclusive lock
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-04-18 15:32:59 Re: event trigger API documentation?