From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Date: | 2013-04-17 18:10:17 |
Message-ID: | 20130417181017.GQ5343@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 01:29:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Uh, not sure how pg_upgrade would detect that as the version number is
> > not stored in pg_controldata, e.g.:
>
> > Data page checksums: enabled/disabled
>
> That seems pretty shortsighted. The field probably ought to be defined
> as containing a checksum algorithm ID number, not a boolean.
>
> But having said that, I'm not sure why this would be pg_upgrade's
> problem. By definition, we do not want pg_upgrade running around
> looking at individual data pages. Therefore, whatever we might do
> about checksum algorithm changes would have to be something that can be
> managed on-the-fly by the newer server.
Well, my idea was that pg_upgrade would allow upgrades from old clusters
with the same checksum algorithm version, but not non-matching ones.
This would allow the checksum algorithm to be changed and force
pg_upgrade to fail.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-17 18:34:51 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-17 18:06:12 | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |