From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Detach/attach table and index data files from one cluster to another |
Date: | 2013-04-12 18:49:28 |
Message-ID: | 20130412184928.GM4361@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > The big win here over a binary COPY is pulling through the indexes as-is
> > as well- without having to rebuild them.
[... lots of reasons this is hard ...]
I agree that it's quite a bit more difficult, to the point that logical
replication which can be selective (eg: give me only table X + indexes)
might end up being the only answer, but otherwise this approach will
likely only be a modest improvement over binary COPY FREEZE- and there
only because we essentially end up skipping the type validation (which
we could just provide as an option, similar to COPY FREEZE...).
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2013-04-12 19:07:36 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-04-12 18:48:43 | Re: [sepgsql 2/3] Add db_schema:search permission checks |