Re: Updating Sourceforge

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updating Sourceforge
Date: 2013-04-12 18:22:49
Message-ID: 20130412182249.GA28228@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:52:08PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:11:45PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> What _is_ interesting is that the Sourceforce editors created their own
> >> PostgreSQL project page:
> >>
> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/postgresql.mirror/
> >>
> >> that is being updated --- I see 9.2.4 updated on 2013-04-04, which was
> >> our release date, and I even see download stats from that date forward.
> >>
> >> What I did just now was to mark 'pgsql' as moved to 'postgresql.mirror';
> >> unfortunately the text is not clickable. FYI, I only knew about 'pgsql'
> >> because I received email from them because I am an admin.
> >
> > I have now made the text clickable to redirect to the sf-editor-updated
> > version. :-)
>
> If there is another one. That's automatically updated. Why not just
> *drop* this one?

I can mark it as an "Abandoned" project --- done. Is that better?

https://sourceforge.net/p/pgsql/admin/overview

That is my only other option (active, moved, abandoned). I don't think
so, but take a look.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2013-04-12 18:27:18 Re: Updating Sourceforge
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2013-04-12 17:52:08 Re: Updating Sourceforge