| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
| Date: | 2013-04-09 17:59:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20130409175929.GU4361@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
* Andres Freund (andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> Also, it changes how privileged the people that get access to the
> vulnerability are. If they are allowed to install at the same time as
> everyone else its somewhat fair game, otherwise there will be people
> making a marketing distinction out of their privileged access.
I do not consider this a game where everyone should be treated 'fairly'
wrt their exposure to attackers. I would be open to including something
in the policy which discourages members from advertising their
membership as a marketing distinction, but I'm not convinced that it's
necessary.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-04-09 18:01:32 | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-04-09 17:54:08 | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |