| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized |
| Date: | 2013-04-09 17:37:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20130409173734.GC27905@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013-04-09 13:34:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It's conceivable that updating to something more current than 9.0.4
> >> would get you out of this --- we've fixed quite a number of WAL replay
> >> bugs in the last two years.
>
> > I see that there is a 9.0.13, but that would be a source upgrade, since Debian
> > doesn't provide later than 9.0.4 AFAICS.
>
> That's a bit hard to believe, especially given that 9.0.13 fixes a
> rather major security bug. Any packager that isn't offering something
> more current than 9.0.4 is *seriously* misfeasant.
Debian simply has never shipped postgres 9.0 at all outside of its
unstable distribution. Afaik it didn't even enter testing once.. Its
pretty normal to drop support for packages from there imo.
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-04-09 17:38:26 | Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-09 17:34:41 | Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized |