Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Date: 2013-04-09 17:30:38
Message-ID: 20130409173038.GB27905@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-04-09 19:18:57 +0200, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl> writes:
> >> Just today one of my systems experienced a kernel panic, and halted abruptly.
> >> Running Linux 3.1.9, PostgreSQL 9.0.4 (Debian 9.0.4-1+b1, to be precise).
>
> >It's conceivable that updating to something more current than 9.0.4
> >would get you out of this --- we've fixed quite a number of WAL replay
> >bugs in the last two years.
>
> I see that there is a 9.0.13, but that would be a source upgrade, since Debian
> doesn't provide later than 9.0.4 AFAICS.

Afaik debian has never shipped 9.0 in any stable release at all. You can
use the packages provided by the postgres community though, they are
compatible:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt

> I suppose upgrading to 9.1.9 is not recommended in this state, or is
> it?

You can at least try, don't think it will make more problems than you
already have.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen R. van den Berg 2013-04-09 17:33:19 Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-04-09 17:28:26 Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook