Re: postgresql command line exploit found in the wild

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgresql command line exploit found in the wild
Date: 2013-04-09 12:44:12
Message-ID: 20130409124412.GE26705@msgid.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Re: Daniel Verite 2013-04-08 <cd81d201-e9fa-4567-ac49-e3e762935747(at)mm>
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> > if you have an internet facing database, patch it immediately!
>
> By the way:
>
> People running 9.1 on debian stable (squeeze) typically use this package:
> http://packages.debian.org/squeeze-backports/postgresql-9.1
>
> Currently, it looks like the fix is only available in pre-compiled form for
> the amd64 architecture (see the bottom of the page). All other archs
> including the popular i386 are stuck at version: 9.1.7-1~bpo60+1

This is just packages.debian.org lagging behind. The packages were
available on Thursday. (Excluding i386/armel.) Look at the timestamps
on http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/pool/main/p/postgresql-9.1/ .

> I find it problematic. One can always switch to the new apt.postgresql.org
> repository that has the latest versions, but how many people are going to not
> even notice the problem, trusting their normal upgrade path?

I'm poking the backports people to throw more resources on building
packages there.

Christoph
--
cb(at)df7cb(dot)de | http://www.df7cb.de/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-04-09 14:25:16 Re: Queries seldomly take >4s while normally take <1ms?
Previous Message CR Lender 2013-04-09 11:47:37 Re: pg_stat_get_last_vacuum_time(): why non-FULL?