From: News Subsystem <news(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject:
Date: 2013-04-09 11:21:52
Message-ID: 201304091121.r39BLq45032652@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
09 Apr 2013 04:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.general
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 04:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse(at)google(dot)com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=210.143.35.31;
posting-account=GbL1LQoAAAA52LT6cIjZnkdtjTyQZ5G0
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <47408590-a31c-4541-a2e4-1da06bb7c64b(at)googlegroups(dot)com>
Subject: Vacuuming time of template1 db
From: hdsarma(at)gmail(dot)com
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:21:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org

We do routine vacuuming of all db's every hour that is postgres, template1 =
and one user database.The user db is used quite heavily, but to our surpris=
e it take least vacuuming time, generally template1 takes most of the time =
followed by postgres and then the user db, template1 db is never used in ou=
r system is there any reason why it takes most time for vacuuming.

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message News Subsystem 2013-04-09 11:23:04
Previous Message Greg Williamson 2013-04-09 10:53:13 Re: Queries seldomly take >4s while normally take <1ms?