From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE EXTENSION BLOCKS |
Date: | 2013-04-03 18:41:05 |
Message-ID: | 20130403184104.GJ5117@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
>
> > I'd expect one of the CREATE EXTENSION commands to succeed
> > and the others to block until the transaction is committed,
> > then to fail with 'extension "oracle_fdw" already exists'.
> >
> > If that is what happens, it's what I'd expect since
> > extension names are unique (see the unique constraint on
> > pg_extension).
>
> Oh, they are not unique per-schema? I guess they are global to the database but then their objects are in the specified schema, then.
Right -- an extension is not considered to live within a schema, they
are database-global. The objects might live in a particular schema (if
it is "relocatable"), and there's support to move those to a different
schema, but this doesn't affect the extension itself.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-04-03 18:42:36 | Re: [PATCH] Exorcise "zero-dimensional" arrays (Was: Re: Should array_length() Return NULL) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-03 18:39:39 | Re: c language functions |