Re: Spin Lock sleep resolution

From: David Gould <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Spin Lock sleep resolution
Date: 2013-04-02 19:58:23
Message-ID: 20130402125823.2c5d50f7@jekyl.davidgould.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 09:01:36 -0700
Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Sorry. I triple checked that the patch was there, but it seems like if you
> save a draft with an attachment, when you come back later to finish and
> send it, the attachment may not be there anymore. The Gmail Offline teams
> still has a ways to go. Hopefully it is actually there this time.

I'll give the patch a try, I have a workload that is impacted by spinlocks
fairly heavily sometimes and this might help or at least give me more
information. Thanks!

-dg

--
David Gould daveg(at)sonic(dot)net
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erikjan Rijkers 2013-04-02 20:36:22 Re: WIP: index support for regexp search
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-04-02 19:24:23 Re: Drastic performance loss in assert-enabled build in HEAD